i have decided to directly address the issue of conspiracy with you .
[kuhn-spir-uh-see] noun, plural con·spir·a·cies
1. the act of conspiring.
2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.
when discussing reality with anyone perhaps it is best to agree upon terms … since this is practically (physically) impossible it becomes necessary to rely upon the intelligence of the listener to put the terms used into context.
if you are talking to ANYONE that watches corporate broadcasts then when the word conspiracy is used it is designed to be defined in a more legalistic manner as:
an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose … He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government (note the subconscious use of this sentence to reinforce authority); LAW: an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
the TRUTH is MOST conspiracies are of the order of the fifth definition as they are unspoken agreements to act in concert .
now that you understand what a conspiracy is let us talk about whether it would be better or not if an actual formal conspiracy does exist as defined under law .
if there was a formal conspiracy, as defined by law, we would find elements of it enshrined in the body of law.
is there a body of law that takes away the God given rights on man to LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ?
from my perspective there is.
since i am an irresponsible animal who will not take responsibility for my own actions a bunch of other monkeys must watch me and stop me from trying to climb the ladder .
to me any LAW that precludes me from pursuing LIFE, LIBERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, to take away inalienable rights granted by the simple fact of my existence, belongs in the formal conspiracy .
Cannabis makes people healthy . It is Schedule I . There was a formal conspiracy to outlaw cannabis. Harry Anslinger, Dupont and William Randolf Hearst.
is there a formal conspiracy to disinherit the people of Earth ?
of that i remain evidentially ignorant but, and this is a very important reality, it is even worse and should cause even more consternation to all of humanity if this is just entirely disorganized destruction .
if there are conspirators creating havoc then they can be stopped . if there are no conspirators then it is just pure Chaos . either leaves very little option for the individual but the first has a solution whereas the second does not, can not and never can (three negatives in one sentence do i get a prize ?)
i wonder if Douglas Feith was thinking along these lines when he came up with his plan to save the “American Way of Life” by executing a “War on Terror” …