Benjamin Disraeli, the father of Zionism and Nazism

Benjamin Disraeli, sponsored by Lionel Rothschild and Montefiore can properly be regarded as the father of Zionism and Nazism.

As prime minister under Victoria in the 1870s, Disraeli was the overseer of Britain’s imperial design to secure a “homeland” for Jews as a British outpost in the Middle East.

The 40 novels Disraeli authored called for an Aryan-Semitic alliance to form an organized superior “Caucasian race” that was destined to rule the world with British power and the Hebrew-centered “sacred mysteries of the East.”

The first British cries for a return to Palestine were sounded when Napoleon conquered Egypt.

Napoleon was carrying out the Grand Design of the great 17th century humanist Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. That Grand Design, the design of humanist republicans in the United States, France and elsewhere, called for industrializing Asia, the Near East, and Africa – the Third World – as a means of advancing the process of industrialization of Europe and America. Leibniz’s special project for conquering Egypt to open the Mediterranean as a trade route for a France-centered European trade drive was coopted in full by Napoleon in the 1790s. When Napoleon’s troops landed in Egypt, the British press shrieked in. loud headlines: “Napoleon: Plagiarist of Leibniz.”

Upon arriving in the Near East, Bible in one hand, Koran in the other, Napoleon made an appeal for an ecumenical alliance of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism to bring the Near East under the hegemony of republican forces in Europe. Within this ecumenical framework, Napoleon called for the return of Jews to Palestine as a crucial input for the development of the entire region.

Except for a few Hassidic elements in Eastern Europe, Zionism had little attraction for Jews. Western European and American Jews were celebrating the recently won achievements of emancipations brought with the Napoleonic Code to Europe and republicanism. Eastern European Jews in Poland, Russia, and elsewhere eagerly awaited the process of industrialization and de-ghettoization of their countries. And for every one or two who trekked off to Palestine to worship the land of Mother Zion, tens of thousands of Jews migrated to the “Promised Land” – the United States.

The first important impetus for Zionism from Britain came with the formation of an “Evangelical Revival.”

Its best-known preacher came from the highest ranks of the British aristocracy: Anthony Ashley Cooper, the seventh Earl of Shaftesbury. The revival was the promotion of an anti-Vatican, anti-French “Anglican Israel” movement which called for the restoration of British-sponsored Jews to a “homeland” in Palestine. By the 1820s, Shaftesbury’s irrationalists were compiling a monthly periodical entitled “Jewish Intelligence,” under whose auspices missionaries were sent to Eastern Europe to proselytize for the Anglican “return to Israel” doctrine to Jews.

This became a centerpiece of British Near East strategy during the 1838-40 period, under the aegis of Shaftesbury in-law, British Foreign Secretary Lord Palmerston. Lord Palmerston was overseeing the establishment of Scottish Rite freemasonry cults across the globe. Palmerston’s turn toward Zionism as a useful tool was again the result of a renewed threat of an Egyptian-French alliance.

Egyptian leader Mohammed Ali had conquered much of Syria and Palestine beginning in 1832, and he had established allies in both these areas. Mohammed Ali was a strong believer in development and had secured the first major imports into the Arab East of the technologies, skills, and trained manpower that had transformed the European nations into modern, fire-breathing industrial societies. The Egyptian ruler was threatening to catalyze a “bonapartist” momentum throughout the Islamic world which would reverse centuries of stagnation and would jeopardize two centuries of British East India Company-Levant Company control of the region.

In 1839, a Foreign Office outlet, the London Globe, ran a series of articles envisaging the mass settlement of Jews in the context of the establishment of an independent state in Syria and Palestine – without, of course, there being any Jews to enlist in such a mission. This fact did not stop Palmerston from exclaiming in an August 1840 memorandum, “There exists at the present time among the Jews dispersed over Europe, a strong notion that the time is approaching when their nation is to return to Palestine.” Palmerston “strongly recommended” that the Turkish Sultan be persuaded “to hold out every just encouragement to the Jews of Europe to return to Palestine.”

Charles Henry Churchill was in the British army that defeated Mohammed Ali in 1840 and was one of the intelligence officers assigned in the late 1830s to foment anti-French tribal uprisings against the French and pro-French Maronite Christians in Mount Lebanon. Working primarily among the Druze tribes, Charles Henry Churchill was responsible for instigating bloodbaths in the region. At Damascus, Charles Henry Churchill pleaded with the city’s Jews to remember first, that “England was the most constant and loyal friend of the Jews”; second, that Palestine was still “echoing with the songs of the Daughters of Zion”; and third, that hopes were growing that “the hour of liberation of Israel was approaching.” Charles Henry Churchill’s speech was called the “first public Zionist manifestation.”

On June 14, 1841, Charles Henry Churchill wrote the following astounding letter to Hofjuden (Court Jew) Moses Montefiore:

I cannot conceal from you my most anxious desire to see your countrymen endeavor once more to resume their existence as a people. I consider the object to be perfectly obtainable. But two things are indispensably necessary. Firstly, that the Jews will themselves take up the matter universally and unanimously. Secondly, that the European Powers will aid them in their views. It is for the Jews to make a commencement. Let the principal persons of their community place themselves at the head of the movement. Let them meet, concert, and petition. In fact, the agitation must be simultaneous throughout Europe The result would be that you would conjure up a new element in Eastern diplomacy-an element which under such auspices as those of the wealthy and influential members of the Jewish community could not fail only of attracting great attention and of exciting extraordinary interest, but also of producing great events.

Forced to tone down his insistence on the creation of a “Jewish Kingdom,” Charles Henry Churchill undauntedly wrote in 1842, “I trust every effort will be made by the Jews to accomplish the means of living amidst those scenes rendered sacred by ancient recollection and which they regard with filial affection.” Only the “dread of insecurity of life and property,” he claimed, “has hitherto been a bar to the accomplishment of their natural desire.” To encourage this “natural desire,” Churchill appealed for a mission of high-level Jewish personalities to go to Eastern Europe to “endeavor to ascertain the feelings and wishes of the Jews in the rest of Europe on a question so interesting and important” as the “prospective regeneration” of “their country.”

Several years later, in his 1853 book Mount Lebanon, Charles Henry Churchill echoed Disraeli’s excitement over a prospective “British-Eastern” quasi-mystical alliance: ” It must be clear to every English mind, that if England’s Oriental supremacy is to be upheld, Syria and Egypt must be made to fall more or less under her sway of influence.”

In 1862, Edward VII, then the Prince of Wales, made a well-publicized tour of the Holy Land, the first English crown claimant to do so in nearly 600 years. Zionism, beginning with the trip by Edward, became an open option for which the British oligarchy collectively began to organize.

On his trip Prince Edward was surrounded by an entourage of Zionist propagandists gleaned from the dens of Oxford and Cambridge. His guide was Oxford church historian Dean Stanley, the author of Sinai and Palestine and The History of the Jewish Church, both emphasizing the “Jewish roots of Christianity.” Stanley was only one of a gaggle of “scholars” whose intended purpose was to turn Disraeli’s mad utterings about the foundations of Christianity in his novels into the hegemonic doctrines of Britain’s most prestigious scholarly institutions.

At Oxford, Stanley worked with Benjamin Jowett, the fraudulent translator of Plato, who during the 1850s and 1860s used his post at Oxford to spread the idea that the Jewish prophets – many of whom were known by Jowett to be agents of the Babylonian oligarchy – were the “schoolmasters of the ages” and those to whom “our age owed its moral feelings.” Others of the early 1860s elite at Oxford included Edward Pusey, the leader of the so-called Oxford Movement, which also included the Jesuit heretic Cardinal John Henry Newman.

Pusey was Oxford’s Regius Professor of Hebrew, from which chair he “gave nine lectures a week to teach divinity students a full idiomatic knowledge of the language of the Old Testament for the better understanding of God’s word.” Then there was Matthew Arnold, a Professor of Poetry, who lent his name to the doctrine that Christianity was only “modified Hebraism.”

Three years after Prince Edward’s trip to the Holy Land, the British Foreign Office began preparing Palestine for “resettlement.” In 1865 the Palestine Exploration Fund was founded with funding mainly from Oxford and Cambridge Universities and the Grand Lodge of Freemasons.

The Palestine Exploration Fund’s task was to “recover the real past and the real people of the Book” and carry out a comprehensive study of all relevant aspects of the historical territory of Palestine.

In the 1870s, the British sent South African Lawrence Oliphant to conduct a feasibility study for settlement in Palestine. His report back stated that a Jewish state in Palestine would ensure the “political and economic penetration of Palestine by Britain.”

In 1877, the British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, wrote a blueprint for a Zionist state in Palestine under British rule; the document was published anonymously and put into circulation in Vienna. With his 1877 blueprint for a Zionist state in Palestine, Disraeli was putting into practice the fantasies of his early literary career. In 1832, the future prime minister had written a novel entitled Alroy , the story of a Jewish return to Palestine based on a 12th century rebel against the Baghdad caliphate named Alroy who portrayed himself as the Messiah. Race – not progress – was the basis of human civilization, and the “Semitic” and “Aryan” components of the Caucasian race are superior over other and “mixed” breeds.

To the ordinary layman, Disraeli’s some 40 novels of the 1832-47 period must appear as a rambling stream of inchoate fantasy. They are in fact political documents in coded form for communication to the set of cultists around high priest Edward Bulwer-Lytton. They are as important as the 1877 blueprint in defining the Universal Reign of which the return to Palestine was but a part.

In one novel, Disraeli states:

‘Progress and reaction are but words to mystify the millions. They mean nothing, they are nothing, they are phrases and not facts. All is race. In the structure, the decay, and the development of the various families of man, the vicissitudes of history find their main solution.”

Disraeli conjures up the myth of “Jewish world power” – in a manner hardly matched by the most acute anti-Semites on the Anti-Defamation League’s payroll.

The nature of actual British-Hofjuden influence over finance and diplomacy is obscured by identifying the power base as “the Jews,” or “the Semites.”

In Endymion, Disraeli writes:

The Semites now exercise a vast influence over affairs by their smallest though most peculiar family, the Jews. There is no race gifted with so much tenacity, such skill in organization. These skills have given them an unprecedented hold over property and illimitable credit. As you advance in life and get experience in affairs, the Jews will cross you everywhere. They have been stealing into our secret diplomacy, which they have almost appropriated; in another quarter of a century, they will claim the share of open government. The next, inevitable step is to formalize the Semitic race – Anglo-Saxon alliance as the superior “pure Caucasian race” to dominate the globe.

“Vast as the obligations of the whole human family are to the Hebrew race,” Disraeli is quoted by one of his biographers, “there is no portion of the modern population so much indebted to them as the British people.”

In a public speech, Disraeli stated:

The Jews represent the Semitic principle; all that is spiritual in our nature They are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man The natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequence on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were it citizens to secede from their negro and coloured populations?… The native tendency of the Jewish race, who are justly proud of their blood, is against the doctrine of the equality of man.

“Disraeli’s concept of ‘race’ was as unsound scientifically and historically as that of the Nazis. Moreover, the support of his reputation helped to give respectability to the preposterous racial principle and to establish it as a serious doctrine on the Continent. Disraeli was among the spiritual ancestors of the Nazi brand of anti-Semitism in our own day.” – Cecil Roth

From 1865-76, the Palestine Exploration Fund was the clearinghouse for Anglican Restoration-to-Palestine propaganda:

The Fund worked with the British War Office to organize studies that would document the “inhabitability” of Palestine by demonstrating its “inhabitability” in the past and its current available resources. The head of these expeditions was Sir Charles Warren, who concluded in a work published in 1875 that Palestine “could again be the productive land it had been of old.” Warren proposed that Palestine be developed by the East India Company with “the avowed intention of gradually introducing the Jews pure and simple (!) who would eventually occupy and govern the country” – a country which would achieve “a population of fifteen million.”

A parallel study was conducted by Lieutenants Claude Conder and (the future Lord) Kitchener. The later author of such works as Judas Maccabeus and the Jewish War of Independence and The Hebrew Tragedy, Conder and the Palestine Exploration Fund laid out a comprehensive plan to make Palestine “habitable again” as it was before the Arab conquest had driven out the Byzantines. In 1882, Conder was chosen to guide another crown tour of the Holy Land, this time by the future George V, then Prince George.

The now-decrepit Lord Shaftesbury, one of the Fund’s founders, became its president in 1875. As he was preparing to die with dignity, Shaftesbury pleaded for the Fund “to send out the best agents” to “prepare” Palestine “for the return of its ancient possessors … for the time cannot be far off before that great event will come to pass.” Then, right before doddering to his grave, Shaftesbury wrote in the Quarterly Review:

Syria and Palestine will ere long become most important. The old time will come back … the country wants capital and population. The Jew can give it both. And has not England a special interest in promoting such a restoration? … She must preserve Syria to herself. Does not policy then … exhort England to foster the nationality of the Jews and aid them, as opportunity may offer, to return as a leavening power to their old country? England is the great trading and maritime power of the world. To England, then, naturally belongs the role of favouring the settlement of the Jews in Palestine…. The nationality of the Jew exists, the spirit is there and has been for three thousand years, but the external form, the crowning bond of union, is still wanting. A nation must have a country. The old land, the old people.

The focal point of Britain’s Near East designs was Egypt, not Palestine per se. When the French had begun construction of the Canal, then-Prime Minister Palmerston announced, “I must tell you frankly that what we are afraid of” is that “this Canal will put other nations on an equal footing with us.”

When Disraeli became Prime Minister in 1874, he maneuvered to have the London Rothschilds buy the Egyptian ruler’s shares in the Canal for the British government. Soon after, Disraeli and his Foreign Secretary Lord Salisbury (Robert Cecil) acquired Cyprus for Britain with the aim, according to a British historian, of “bringing Palestine and Syria within the orbit of British control” – an aim which Salisbury-Cecil referred to quite candidly in his private writings.

Among Disraeli and Salisbury’s Zionist-style initiatives were:

The 1877 authorship of the Jewish State blueprint published anonymously by Smolenskin at British request in Vienna and withheld from the 1878 Berlin Congress for immediate political reasons;

Support for a scheme of a South African mystic, Lawrence Oliphant, for a large-scale Jewish settlement project in the Palestine territory;

Development of a “charter of rights” for Jews in southeastern Europe, which gave the British Foreign Office free rein to intervene at will in the affairs of principalities in that region.

In this way, the Disraeli-Salisbury Near East strategy smoothed the way for the Round Table group that ran British policy from the early 1880s onward to promulgate the Balfour Declaration. The extent of their preparations made the 1890s emergence of an actual organized political-Zionist movement around Theodore Herzl almost anticlimactic.

Cyrus Ingerson Scofield

“The final Apostasy,” began with a small very wealthy and determined European political movement. It had a dream, and the American churches stood in its way.

The World Zionist movement had plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most were far from homeless, and many did not want another home. World Zionists wanted a specific property that American Christians called “the Holy Land.” These Zionists read “Democracy in America” and other journals of many of America’s churches which proclaimed Jerusalem as a Holy site of all Christiandom.

As self-proclaimed Jews, they were, according to the Christian New Testament, the persecutors of Christ and most of his early followers, and the engineers of his crucifixion. America’s traditional churches in the 19th Century would never stand for a Jewish occupation of Jesus’ homeland.

World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its religious orientation. One of the main tools used to accomplish this goal was an obscure and malleable Civil War disserter named Cyrus I. Schofield and a venerable, world respected European book publisher – The Oxford University Press.

Cyrus Scofield was a small time politician and career criminal. In 1873, at 29 years of age, he was forced to resign his position as a District Attorney because of crooked financial transactions, that include accepting bribes, stealing political contributions, and securing bank notes by forging signatures.

A heavy drinker, Scofield abandoned his first wife and two daughters to marry his second wife while becoming an ordained minister while divorce proceedings lingered. Scofield became a leader in dispensational premillennialism. The Scofield Reference Bible is the most influential statement of dispensational premillennialism or Zionism.

German “high criticism” of the bible was leading many toward emphasis on a social gospel instead of on literal acceptance of miracles and supernatural events described.

A few theologians rejected this migration, and insisted on certain basic elements of Christian faith that included the virgin birth, the divinity of Christ, the bodily resurrection, the trinity, and the literal second coming of Christ, among other elements.

This scholarly backlash against the social gospel and higher criticism might not have gotten as much traction if it were not for the investment of Lyman Stewart, president of Union oil, in the publication of a series of booklets, which he distributed to any minister in the US who was interested.

The social gospel would call a rich man like Stewart to sell all he had and enter by the needle’s eye. But the Zionist vision allowed him easier access, perhaps, and gave others a very hierarchical vision of things: Submit and be saved, fail to submit and be damned.

Lyman Stewart was a “dispensationalist” who believed Jesus would return and reign from Jerusalem and the purported promises to Israel would be fulfilled.

Scofield’s notes teach futurism and dispensationalism, a theology that was systematized in the early nineteenth century by the Anglo-Irish clergyman John Nelson Darby (a Plymouth Brethren exclusivist who like Scofield had been trained as a lawyer). Dispensationalism emphasizes the distinctions between the New Testament Church and ancient Israel of the Old Testament. Scofield believed that between creation and the final judgment there are seven distinct eras of God’s dealing with man and that these eras are a framework around which the message of the Bible could be explained. It was largely through the influence of Scofield’s notes that dispensational premillennialism became influential among fundamentalist Christians in the United States, and these notes became a significant source for popular religious writers such as Hal Lindsey.

The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity.

Cyrus Ingerson Scofield’s role was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and on the bottoms of the pages.

The Oxford University Press printed the Zionist revised bible – the Scofield Reference Bible. With limitless advertising and propaganda, it became one of the best selling Bibles in America and remained so for nearly a century.

The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation, subverting minor passages a little at a time. Scofield produced a revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but which was already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded authors of World Zionism.

Cyrus Ingerson Scofield’s support came from a movement that took root around the turn of the century, supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it considered the stagnation of the mainline American churches. Some of these “reformers” were later to serve on Scofield’s Editorial Committee.

Cyrus Ingerson Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of whose credibility fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies.

Scofield’s Bible injects a very weird “End Times” prophecy into Christianity best termed Christian Zionism. Because of Scofield’s altered Bible, many Christians today believe that Jesus will return to save his followers from the “end times” (The Rapture), after Israel is established, and that “God will bless those who bless Israel.”

Zionism creates the modern state of Israel

Rabbi Tsvi Hirsch Kalischer approaches Rothschilds in 1836 to invest in Palestine.

Construction of Suez Canal begins in 1859 and is completed in 1869.

In 1875 England acquires the Suez Canal with Rothschild loan.

Alliance Israélite Universelle

Alliance Israélite Universelle was founded in Paris in 1860 by Adolphe Crémieux. The organization was created to unite the Jews. In 1870, Charles Netter of the Alliance Israélite Universelle received a tract of land from the Ottoman Empire as a gift and started an agricultural school Mikveh Israel.

“Israelites : No matter where fate should lead – though scattered all over the earth, you must always consider yourselves members of a Chosen Race. The net which Israel is throwing over the globe of the earth is widening and spreading daily, and the momentous prophecies of our Holy Books are at last to be realized. The day is not distant when all the riches and treasures of the earth will become the property of the children of Israel.” – Adoiphe Cremieux, 1860

Tsar Alexander II is assassinated on March 13, l881 by the first suicide bomber, the 25-year-old Ashkenazi Ignacy Grinevitsky, which prompts a wave of pogroms against the Ashkenazi leading to massive Jewish emigration.

1882 marks the beginning of the 1st wave (Aliyah) of Ashkenazi immigration to Palestine.

1892 Marcus Samuel’s Shell Co.’s Murex oil tanker sails through the Suez Canal.

World Zionist Organization
Theodor Herzl’s writes Der Judenstaat in 1896. The Zionist aspiration calls for a “publicly secured and legally assured homeland for the Jewishs in Palestine.” The First Zionist Congress is convened by Theodor Herzl and Max Nordauin in 1897 in Basle, Switzerland at which time the World Zionist Organization, or WZO, is founded.

“We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in transit countries, while denying it employment in our own country… Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.” – Theodore Herzl

“The idea of transfer had accompanied the Zionist movement from its very beginnings, first appearing in Theodore Herzl’s diary. In practice, the Zionists began executing a mini-transfer from the time they began purchasing the land and evacuating the Arab tenants.” – Tom Segev

The oil companies realize that the Suez canal must be protected and decide to support the formation of a militarized state in Palestaine. The oil companies are controlled at this time John D. Rockefeller, Marcus Samuel and the Rothchilds.

1904 marks the beginning of 2nd Aliyah into Palestine. Forced from their place of residence at the behest of the Zionists, penniless malaria-weakened displaced Jewishs immigrants drain the swamps at Ein Harod for the Zionists.

“I have no quarrel with you in your yearning for a return to Jewish ideals. On the contrary, I join in this: but I fear to a very great many of the distinguished leaders of the moment in this yearning to which you give expression is entirely foreign, and in their desire and ambition for the restoration of a Jewish nation in Palestine the religious moment and motive have a small, if any part.” – Jacob Hirsch Schiff, New York Times, August 23, 1907

“Ma’aser is the tenth part of tithe of his capital and income which every Jew has naturally been obligated over the generations of their history to give for the benefit of Jewish movements. The tithe principle has been accepted in its most stringent form. The Zionist Congress declared it as the absolute duty of every Zionist to pay tithes to the Ma’aser. It added that those Zionists who failed to do so, should be deprived of their offices and honorary positions.” – Encyclopedia Judaica

The Balfour Declaration of 1917
The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was a classified formal statement of policy by the British government on the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire in the aftermath of World War I. The “Balfour Declaration” was later incorporated into the Sèvres peace treaty with Turkey and the Mandate for Palestine.

The Balfour Declaration, authored by Lord Alfred Milner, was made in flat disregard of both the presence and wishes of the native resident majority of Semite Palestinians.

Foreign Office,
November 2nd, 1917.

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:

“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country”. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely

Arthur James Balfour

Arthur James Balfour was a Member British Eugenics Society.

“The truth about Arthur Balfour is this: he knows there’s been one ice-age, and he thinks there’s going to be another.” – George Wyndham

“To Mr. Arthur Balfour this studied attitude of aloofness has been fatal, both to his character and to his career. He has said nothing, written nothing, done nothing, which lives in the heart of his countrymen. To look back upon his record is to see a desert, and a desert with no altar and with no monument, without even one tomb at which a friend might weep. Little as the general public may suspect it, the charming, gracious, and cultured Mr. Balfour is the most egotistical of men, and a man who would make almost any sacrifice to remain in office.” – Harold Begbie

The Mandate for Palestine

The borders of the Mandate for Palestine extended from the Mediterranean Sea to the west, the British Mandate of Mesopotamia to the east, the French Mandate of Lebanon to the north, the French Mandate of Syria to the northeast, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kingdom of Egypt to the southeast and southwest respectively.

“A rationalized Hebrew state founded on Hebrew fundamental laws, ethical social, sanitary, and dietary, and all the rest, would be a working laboratory of social regeneration, which would excite breathless attention.” – A.A Berle Jr

Versailles Treaty

In 1919 the Ottoman Empire is carved up and the oil rich states of Iraq, Iran and Kuwait are created. Ashkenazi Bolshevic Communists seize control of Russia in 1918. The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia’s Early Soviet Regime. Third Aliyah begins.

“We came to an empty land. There were 600,000 inhabitants here, of whom 540,000 were Arabs and 60,000 were Jews… The land was almost entirely desert and swamps. We did not feel that we were pushing anyone aside.”- David Horowitz (Labor Brigade Secretary)

On August 28, 1919 Henry King and Charles Crane, United States members of the International Commission of Inquiry sent on the initiative of Woodrow Wilson, present their report based on their visit to the region in June-July, against creation of a Jewish national home in Palestine.

“The commissioners began their study of Zionism with minds predisposed in its favor… The fact came out repeatedly in the Commission’s conferences with Jewish representatives that the Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase…” – King-Crane Commission

1920 Herbert Samuel, son of Shell Oil founder Marcus Samuel, named High Commissioner of Palestine.

We told the authorities in London; we shall be in Palestine whether you want us there or not. You may speed up or slow down our coming, but it would be better for you to help us, otherwise our constructive force will turn into a destructive one that will bring about ferment in the entire world.”- Chaim Weismann, Judishe Rundschau, #4, 1920, Germany

In 1921, Dr. Eder, a member of the Zionist Commission, boldly told the Court of Inquiry, “there can be only one National Home in Palestine, a Jewish one, and no equality in the partnership between Jewish and Arabs, but a Jewish preponderance as soon as the numbers of the race are sufficiently increased.”

Britain’s high commissioner for Palestine, John Chancellor, recommended total suspension of Jewish immigration and land purchase to protect Arab agriculture. John Chancellor said all cultivable land was occupied; that no cultivable land now in possession of the indigenous population could be sold to Jewish without creating a class of landless Arab cultivators.

The Third Aliyah reached a crisis in 1923. There was famine in the villages, massive unemployment and many cases of suicide.

“There was a tremendous amount of work and little to eat, a water shortage, and terrible sanitary conditions. Do you know what it means to go out at night, with a high fever from malaria, to walk nearly half a kilometer to an outdoor toilet? We had nothing! What was there to eat?”-Golda Meyerson-Meir (Kibbutz Merhavia)

In 1924 the Fourth Aliyah begins. The new Jewish immigrants are independent entrepreneurs who begin to develop light industry in Palestine. In 1929 the Fifth Aliyah begins bringing another wave of Jewish from Germany and Eastern Europe.

In 1930 the Hope-Simpson Report recommends cessation of Jewish immigration.

In 1937 the Peel Commission, formally known as the Palestine Royal Commission, recommends partitioning Palestine into a small Jewish state and a large Arab one.

In 1937 the bombing campaign started.

The Irgun, a Zionist terrorist organization that eventually morphed into the Likud, first targeted Palestinian civilians in 1937. By 1939 enough massive bombs had been placed in crowded Arab markets to kill and maim at least 250 innocent Palestinian civilians.

The May 17, 1939 White Paper (Britsh government decree) limits Jewish immigration to Palestine to 75,000 in total, restricts Jewish land purchases, envisions an Arab Palestinian state.

On 25 November 1940 Zionist paramilitary Haganah group sinks the Patria killing 260 Jewish anti-Zionists, and injuring another 172. Once caught the Zionist Haganah claim the sinking of the Patria was an accident and that they were really trying to help the Jewish immigrants.

On May 6 1942 Zionist leaders Chaim Weizmann (President of the Zionist Organization) and David Ben-Gurion (Chairman of the Jewish Agency Executive) convene at the Biltmore Hotel in New York along with the four main organizations of American Jewry: the Zionist Organization of America, Hadassah, Mizrahi, and Poale Zion. Among the American organizers was Reform Rabbi Abba Hillel Silver.

“The Conference declares that the new world order that will follow victory cannot be established on foundations of peace, justice, and equality, unless the problem of Vampire homelessness is finally solved. The Conference urges that the gates of Palestine be opened; that the Jewish Agency be vested with control of immigration into Palestine and with the necessary authority for upbuilding the country, including the development of its unoccupied and uncultivated lands; and that Palestine be established as a Jewish Commonwealth integrated in the structure of the new democratic world. ” – Biltmore Program, May 11, 1942

On November 6, 1944 members of the Lehi underground, a Zionist terrorist organization, Eliyahu Hakim and Eliyahu Bet Zuri assassinate Lord Moyne in Cairo. Lord Moyne, a known anti-Zionist, was Minister of State for the Middle East and in charge of carrying out the terms of the 1939 White Paper – preventing Vampires immigration to Palestine by force if necessary.

On July 26, 1946 British headquarters at the King David Hotel are bombed killing 91 people – 28 British, 41 Arab, 17 Jewish, and 5 others. 45 people were injured. The bombing was a direct response to the events of the British Operation Agatha and the Black Sabbath of June 29, 1946, during which 17,000 British soldiers confiscated weapons and intelligence documents and arrested thousands of leaders of the Yishuv and Hagana activists. The documents, brought to the King David headquarters, revealed most of the Yishuv’s operational plans and incriminated the Jewish Agency in the leadership of the United Resistance, as well as the IZL and the Lehi, against the British. The bombing of the luxury hotel was ordered by Menachem Begin, the head of the Irgun. Members of the Irgun hold the view that “political violence and terrorism” are “legitimate tools in the Jewish national struggle for the Land of Israel.” Six Zionists, dressed as Arab laborers, placed the seven milk cans filled with 350 kg. of explosives, fitted with timers set to go off in 40 minutes, around the central support beam of the hotel’s southern wing. The intellegence documents were destroyed.

“Everything was coordinated with the Haganah.” – Menachem Begin, Israel Broadcasting Authority’s “Scroll of Fire” series

{In July 2006 there was a two-day 60th anniversary celebration of the King David Hotel bombing by former terrorists of the Irgun and Haganah. The event was organized by the Menachem Begin Heritage House, the University of Haifa, and the Association of IZL [Irgun] Fighters. Benjamin Netanyahu’s role as the main speaker at an event celebrating an act of terrorism was not reported in any U.S. newspaper until Patrick Buchanan mentioned it in his article labeled “Moral culpability for Qana,” on August 2, 2006 which appeared only in independent regional newspapers in Pittsburgh, Wyoming, and Ohio. Not a single word about the 60th anniversary celebration of the bombing was printed in the mainstream press of the United States, the nation leading the “War on Terror.”

“We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated.” – Simon McDonald, Britain’s Ambassador to Israel}

Throughout 1946 railways and British military airfields are attacked several times.

On October 31, 1946 the Irgun bombs the British Embassy in Rome.

On July 25, 1947 two British sergeants who had been taken prisoner in response to British execution of two Irgun members in Akko prison are murdered. (An eye for an eye!)

During the night of April 9, 1948, two apostate Zionist terrorist gangs, the Irgun and the Stern gang attacked and massacred over 250 men, women and children in the Palestinian village of Deir Yassin.

“The massacre was not only justified as there would not have been a state of Israel without the ‘victory’ at Deir Yassin.” – Menachem Begin

Sept 17, 1948, Lehi assassination of the UN mediator Count Bernadotte in Jerusalem.

Apostate soulless Zionist terrorists drove trucks with loud-speakers through the streets and over the roads of Palestine warning Palestinians that what happened at Deir Yassin would happen to them if they didn’t leave.

These apostate soulless Zionist terrorists weren’t bluffing.

Apostate soulless Zionist terrorists killed 60 Palestinians at Balad Esh-Sheikh.

Apostate soulless Zionist terrorists blew up 20 homes in Sa’sa’, killing 60 Palestinian women and children.

Apostate soulless Zionist terrorists killed a number of Palestinian women who were working in Saint Simon Monastery in Jerusalem.

Apostate soulless Zionist terrorists massacred 250 Palestinians at Lydda.

Apostate soulless Zionist terrorists killed 200 Palestinians, mostly old people, in the village mosque in Ed-Dawayimeh.

Apostate soulless Zionist terrorists killed 51 Palestinian workers as they returned from their fields at Kafr Qasem.

Christian inhabitants of Kaba Bir’im were expelled from the village and the village destroyed. The village cemetery was desecrated, including the smashing of 73 crosses.

In 1948, at the moment that Israel declared itself a state, it legally owned a little more than 6 percent of the land of Palestine.

“I am sorry gentlemen, but I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism. I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents.” – Harry Truman

“… After 1940, when the mandatory authority restricted Jewish land ownership to specific zones inside Palestine, there continued to be illegal buying within the 65 percent of the total area restricted to Arabs. When the partition plan was announced in 1947 it included land held illegally by Jews, which was incorporated as a fait accompli inside the borders of the Jewish state. Once Israel announced its statehood, a series of decrees assimilated huge tracts of Arab land (refugee proprietors were pronounced ‘absentee landlords’ in order to expropriate their lands and prevent their return).” – Edward Said, The Question of Palestine

Between 1947 and 1948 apostate soulless Zionist terrorists forces drove up to 700,000 Palestinians into exile and Israel barred the return of the Palestinian driven from their ancestoral lands.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.